吉林省中医药管理局主要职责内设机构和人员编制规定
吉林省人民政府办公厅
吉政办发〔2004〕45号
吉林省人民政府办公厅关于印发吉林省中医药管理局主要职责内设机构和人员编制规定的通知
各市州、县(市)人民政府,省政府各厅委、各直属机构:
《吉林省中医药管理局主要职责内设机构和人员编制规定》已经省政府批准,现予印发。
吉林省人民政府办公厅
二○○四年六月二日
吉林省中医药管理局主要职责内设机构和人员编制规定
根据《中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅关于印发〈吉林省人民政府机构改革方案〉的通知》(厅字〔2003〕44号),设置吉林省中医药管理局。省中医药管理局为省卫生厅管理的主管全省中医药事业的行政机构。
一、主要职责
(一)贯彻执行国家卫生、药品的有关政策和法律、法规,以及国家中医、中医中药结合、中西医结合和民族医疗医药的方针、政策和发展战略;组织起草有关地方性法规规章,研究拟订全省中医、中医中药结合、中西医结合以及民族医疗医药发展战略。
(二)规划、指导和协调全省中医医疗、科研、教学机构的结构布局及其运行机制的改革;监督执行各类中医医疗、保健等机构管理规范和技术标准;负责省级中医医疗机构执业许可证的核发工作;参与制定全省基本药物目录;负责中医医疗广告的审批和发证。
(三)对中医医疗、预防、保健、康复、护理及临床用药等进行监督和业务指导;依据有关规定在中医行业推行医药人员执业资格制度。
(四)研究和指导中西医结合工作,执行国家有关管理规范和技术标准;拟订地方规范和技术标准;监督和协调管理中西医结合的医疗、研究机构。
(五)研究和指导全省民族医疗医药工作;组织各民族医疗医药理论、医术、药物的发掘、整理和总结;监督和协调管理各民族医疗医药机构。
(六)拟订和组织实施全省中医中药科学研究、技术开发规划;管理全省重大中医药科研项目,组织重大中医药科技成果的鉴定、推广和保密工作。
(七)组织拟订和实施全省中医药教育发展规划,加强中医药人才培养,管理指导中医药师承教育;对中医药教育质量进行监督和业务指导。
(八)组织拟订全省中医药人员职业道德规范,指导中医药行业的社会主义精神文明建设和职业道德建设。
(九)指导和协调中医药对外交流与技术合作,推进中医药科学的国际传播;联系相关中医药社会团体。
(十)承办省政府及省卫生厅交办的其他事项。
二、内设机构
根据上述主要职责,省中医药管理局内设4个职能处(室):
(一)办公室(财务处)。
协助局领导组织协调机关日常政务;负责会议、秘书、档案、保密、信访、信息、督办等日常工作;负责编制全省中医药事业发展规划;管理全省中医专项补助经费和局机关财务;管理直属单位的事业经费、基建和国有资产等;指导协调全省中医药同国际及港、澳、台地区的合作与交流;承办局机关的外事工作。
(二)政策法规处。
根据国家卫生、药品的有关政策和法律法规,以及中医行业(包括中医中药结合、中西医结合、民族医疗医药)发展战略和方针、政策,组织起草有关地方性法规规章和政策并监督实施;编制全省中医行业发展规划并组织实施;根据各类卫生技术准则,拟订与完善中医医疗、保健、护理等有关人员的技术职务评定标准和医疗、保健、护理等人员执业资格标准并监督实施,参与制定执业中药师资格标准;规划并指导和协调中医医疗、科研、教学、中西医结合、民族医疗医药机构的结构布局及拟订管理规范;组织中医药重大理论或实际问题的调查研究和信息服务;承办有关改革、医德医风建设等宣传工作。
(三)医政处。
拟订全省应用中医药防治重大疾病的规划和办法;参与制定全省基本药物目录和农村合作医疗用药目录;组织拟订和实施中医医疗、预防、保健、康复、护理及临床用药等管理规范和技术标准;监督管理各类中医、中西医结合、民族医疗机构,对其他医疗机构的中医业务进行指导,推行医药人员执业资格制度;管理和指导民族医疗医药工作;组织各民族医疗医药的理论、医术、药物的发掘、整理、总结和提高,拟订和逐步完善相关的制度规范和技术标准;监督管理按照中医理论研制的药膳;负责中医医疗机构执业许可证的核发和三级以上中医医院设置的审核报批;负责中医医疗广告的审批工作。
(四)科技教育处。
拟订并组织实施中医药科学研究、技术开发规划和中医中药结合、中西医结合研究方向及措施办法;指导与协调中医药科研机构建设;组织中医药重大科研课题的协作攻关;组织中药研制及科技成果的鉴定、奖励与推广;开展中医药学术交流与科技合作。组织拟订和实施全省中医药教育发展规划,指导中医药教育及人才培养工作,管理指导中医药师承教育。
三、人员编制
省中医药管理局机关行政编制13名,待接收军转干部行政编制2名(另行下达),机关工勤人员事业编制2名。
领导职数:局长1名,副局长2名;正副处长(主任)4名。
四、其他事项
省中医药管理局机关干部人事工作由省卫生厅负责;机关党群工作由省卫生厅机关党委负责。
Chapter VII
Special Rules for Anti-dumping Disputes
OUTLINE
Section One Recourse of Anti-dumping Disputes to the DSB
I Introduction
II Sufficiency of Panel Request under the AD Agreement
(i) Art. 6.2 of the DSU and Article 17.4 of the AD Agreement
(ii) Art. 6.2 of the DSU and Article 17.5(i) of the AD Agreement
(iii) A Summary Guiding
III General Legal Basis for Claims against Legislation as Such
IV Special Rules for Claims against Anti-dumping Legislation as Such
(i) Introduction
（ii）General Legal Basis under Art. 17 of the AD Agreement
(iii) Understanding of Art. 17.4 of the AD Agreement
(iv) Extensive Basis in Context
(v) A Summary
Section Two Ad hoc Standard of Review for Anti-dumping Disputes
I Introduction
II Special Standard of Review under the AD Agreement: in General
(i) Ad hoc Approaches to Domestic Determination: Art. 17.6
(ii) Relationship between Art. 11 of the DSU and Art. 17.6 of the AD Agreement
(iii) A Summary Guiding
III Scope of Review of Fact-findings: Art. 17.5(ii) of the AD Agreement
(i)Overview of the GATT Practice
(ii)Concerned Rulings in Reports Issued by WTO Panels
(iii)Tentative Remarks: Guidance from the Appellate Body
Section One
Recourse of Anti-dumping Disputes to the DSB
I Introduction
Compared to the legally fragmented previous GATT dispute settlement system, the new WTO dispute settlement system is an integrated system with much broader jurisdiction and less scope for “rule shopping” and “forum shopping”. However, according to Art. 1.2 of the DSU which states in part that, “[t]he rules and procedures of this Understanding shall apply subject to such special or additional rules and procedures on dispute settlement contained in the covered agreements as are identified in Appendix 2 to this Understanding”, many covered agreements under the WTO jurisdiction continue to include special dispute settlement rules and procedures. Such special rules and procedures are listed in Appendix 2 to the DSU. And in this chapter, we will focus on such special dispute settlement rules concerning anti-dumping disputes, i.e. Arts. 17.4 through 17.7 of the Anti-dumping Agreement (‘the AD Agreement’).
An analysis of the DSB practice suggests a separate contribution of this chapter to this book, merited by dispute settlement proceedings in the anti-dumping field. In this chapter, the author focuses on the two main issues repeatedly raised, as preliminary or procedural issues, during dispute settlement regarding anti-dumping. One is the issue of recourse of anti-dumping disputes to the DSB, which deals mainly with Arts. 17.4 and 17.5(i) of the AD Agreement; the other one is the issue of standard of review in anti-dumping areas, which runs most on Art. 17.6, including Art. 17.5(ii), of the AD Agreement. And in this section we will focus on the first one. In this respect, Arts. 17.4 and 17.5(i) of the AD Agreement states:
“17.4 If the Member that requested consultations considers that the consultations pursuant to paragraph 3 have failed to achieve a mutually agreed solution, and if final action has been taken by the administering authorities of the importing Member to levy definitive anti-dumping duties or to accept price undertakings, it may refer the matter to the Dispute Settlement Body (“DSB”). When a provisional measure has a significant impact and the Member that requested consultations considers that the measure was taken contrary to the provisions of paragraph 1 of Article 7, that Member may also refer such matter to the DSB.
17.5 The DSB shall, at the request of complaining party, establish a panel to examine the matter based upon:
(i) a written statement of the Member making the request indicating how a benefit accruing to it, directly or indirectly, under this Agreement has been nullified or impaired, or that the achieving of the objectives of the Agreement is being impeded, and
(ii) …”
II Sufficiency of Panel Request under the AD Agreement
Generally, as noted in previously, it is only where the provisions of the DSU and the special or additional rules and procedures of a covered agreement cannot be read as complementing each other that the special or additional provisions are to prevail. A special or additional provision should only be found to prevail over a provision of the DSU in a situation where adherence to the one provision will lead to a violation of the other provision, that is, in the case of a conflict between them. Then the author means to get down to the issue of whether these provisions cited above limits panel request under the AD Agreement to somehow other than those required by Art. 6.2 of the DSU.
In Mexico-HFCS (DS132), the dispute involves the imposition of a definitive anti-dumping measure by the Mexican Ministry of Trade and Industrial Development (SECOFI) on imports of high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) from the United States. Mexico argues that the United States' request for establishment of this Panel is not consistent with the requirements of Art. 6.2 of the DSU and Art. 17.4 and 17.5(i) of the AD Agreement, and therefore argues that the Panel must terminate the proceeding without reaching the substance of the United States' claims.
(i) Art. 6.2 of the DSU and Art. 17.4 of the AD Agreement
In considering the alleged failure to assert claims under Art. 6.2 of the DSU and Art. 17.4 of the AD Agreement, the Panel rules that: 1
“[W]e note first that the Appellate Body has stated that Article 6.2 of the DSU and Article 17.4 of the AD Agreement are complementary and should be applied together in disputes under the AD Agreement. It has further stated that: ‘the word “matter” has the same meaning in Article 17 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement as it has in Article 7 of the DSU. It consists of two element: The specific “measure” and the “claims” relating to it, both of which must be properly identified in a panel request as required by Article 6.2 of the DSU.’
昆明市国家助学贷款实施办法
云南省昆明市人民政府办公厅
昆明市人民政府办公厅关于转发《昆明市国家助学贷款实施办法》的通知
昆政办〔2001〕19号
各县（市）、区人民政府，市政府有关委、办、局：
经市政府同意，现将《昆明市国家助学贷款实施办法》转发给你们，请认真贯彻执行。执行中有何问题，及时向市教委、市财政局反映。
昆明市人民政府
二○○一年三月十五日
昆明市国家助学贷款实施办法
昆明市教育委员会 昆明市财政局
根据《国务院办公厅转发中国人民银行等有关部门关于助学贷款实施意见的通知》和《云南省国家助学贷款实施意见》的精神，为实施科教兴国战略，加速人才培养，资助经济贫困学生完成学业，结合我市实际，特制定本实施办法。
一、可申请助学贷款的范围及条件
（一）贷款人必须是市属高校中全日制研究生、本专科学生。
（二）贷款人属家庭经济确有困难，本人提出申请，父母所在单位、街道办事处或农村乡级（含乡级）以上单位出具贫困证明。
（三）贷款人学习刻苦努力、品行端正，具有较强的信用还款意识。
二、财政贴息资金来源
每年由实行国家助学贷款的学校提出年度贴息计划上报市财政局，经市财政局审核后列入当年教育事业费支出预算。
三、贷款限额、期限及利率
（一）国家助学贷款每年的最高贷款限额不超过学生在读期间所需的学费、生活费和住宿费之和。学费和住宿费按物价部门核定的标准执行。生活费按当年学校所在地区城镇居民最低生活保障线执行（我市2001年按140元/月提高50％测算，月人均增加70元，合计210元）。
（二）贷款期限按贷款人在读年限加毕业后最长不超过四年的时间确定。
（三）助学贷款的利率按中国人民银行规定的同期贷款利率执行。
四、贷款发放及还款方式
（一）助学发贷款采取一次申请，分年发放的方式。贷款银行按《借款合同》约定放贷计划分年度将贷款转划入学校“助学贷款管理基金专户”学校从专户上提取贷款人应交助学费和住宿费后，其余部分划入相应学生生活账户。
（二）助学贷款本金采取按《借款合同》约定的还款期限分次偿还的方式。贷款人可随时将部分或全部贷款提前归还贷款银行。提前归还的部分按合同约定利率和实际使用时间计收利息；贷款本息不能按期归还的，贷款人按规定计收罚息。
（三）助学贷款利息按年结息，不计复利。在上述规定贷款期限以内市财政给予贴息50％，剩余50％由贷款人支付。
五、贷款和贴息审批程序
（一）贷款人向经办银行申请助学贷款。由本人提出申请，经批准后填写《国家助学贷款申请推荐及审批表》，送经办银行审批。
（二）经办银行审核同意后，由银行与贷款人直接签订《贷款合同》。
（三）经办银行将贷款按年度划入学校“助学贷款管理基金专户”，由学校向贷款人核发。
（四）贷款人按《借款合同》约定还本利息，结清贷款。
（五）年底终了，由学校按实际发生贷款数额向财政申请贴息资金。财政根据《借款合同》，将贴息资金按年拨付给经办银行。
六、职责
市教育行政主管部门负责组织、协调、监督检查工作。财政部门负责财政贴息的审核，确认以及贴息资金拨付工作。学校负责贷款推荐审核，贷款和还款的组织，助学贷款专户的日常管理工作。
七、检查
教育行政主管部门和财政部门每年对国家助学贷款的实施进行检查。
八、本办法自2001年1月1日起实行。